Who Are You Calling A Bad Guy?

In the movie Wreck-It Ralph, unhappy video game villain Ralph is fed up with his lot in life. A well-meaning fellow villain encouragingly tells him “Ralph, just because you are ’bad guy’ doesn’t mean you are bad guy.”

True enough. But Star Trek Into Darkness is probably the first film I’ve seen where the villain is debatably more moral than the hero.

Don’t believe me? Okay…

Star Trek Into Darkness spoilers! And I mean BIG spoilers!!!!

Stop now if you haven’t seen the movie!

Still with me?

Okay then.

Taking the plot in chronological order: Khan is awoken by Admiral Marcus and manipulated into helping Marcus prepare for – even provoke – a war with the Klingons. Khan has no choice: his crew, his ’family’, are being held hostage by a ruthless man (said ruthlessness is later demonstrated on screen by Marcus’ behaviour towards Kirk and his crew, so Khan is clearly right to fear him.)

Understandably, Khan tries to escape Marcus’ clutches. Not, we should note, by attacking Marcus. There’s no evidence his scheme to smuggle his sleeping crewmates out of Marcus’ clutches involves any violence.

The scheme is discovered, and the missiles are removed from Khan’s control. He tells Kirk later that he assumed his crew had been murdered. Which is fair enough: Marcus has a big secret to conceal, the crew are evidence against him, and, as we’ve already noted, Marcus is quite prepared to kill to achieve his ends.

So, Khan sets out for revenge against the whole of Starfleet. Maybe an overreaction. But Khan presumably has no idea how official Marcus’ actions were, or which officers are corrupt and which aren’t. For all he knows, they’re all guilty.

He comes up with an elaborate plan to bomb the facility he worked for. (Worth remembering that everyone there is breaking Starfleet regulations by functioning as a spy agency.) That plan involves offering a father a choice no parent would refuse: but it is a choice. He could refuse. Marcus later claims he was ’forced’ to commit the bombing, but Marcus would say that, wouldn’t he…

People die, here and in Khan’s later attack on Starfleet HQ. Few of them deserve it. I wouldn’t justify that objectively –  but in cinematic terms, we’ve excused far worse when it was committed by a character labelled ’hero’ instead of ’villain’. If, say, Bruce Willis’ family were killed by corrupt cops, and he then took an attack helicopter to their precinct, killing corrupt and honest cops alike, we’d probably cheer him on.

Khan goes to ground on the Klingon homeworld, which initially feels like a dumb choice for a genius: but in fact, it gets him exactly what he wants. Marcus puts the missiles in space, on board the Enterprise, where Khan has a chance of getting to them and verifying whether his crew are dead or still in there.

While on the Enterprise, Khan is a model prisoner. He tells the truth when questioned, makes no attempt to escape (despite being inexplicably transferred to the insecure sick bay), and warns Kirk about the danger he’s in. He doesn’t even resist when Kirk tries to beat the crap out of him after his surrender.

Under threat from Marcus, Kirk asks Khan for help to infiltrate the enemy ship. Despite Kirk’s suspicions, he does nothing during the infiltration to betray their alliance. Indeed, he saves Kirk’s life on the journey between ships (self-interest, perhaps, but I bet Khan could have taken that ship alone – or at least believes that he could…)

And, at the moment their alliance triumphs over Marcus and they take his ship, the deal is broken – by Kirk!

Recovering from being maliciously stunned, Khan finally snaps. He brutally attacks his betrayers, threatens to wipe out the entire crew in order to get his people back, then opens fire on the Enterprise. Hardly saintly, but this is a desperate man trying to protect his crew from a man who’s used and betrayed him…

And who can blame him? It turns out that Spock programmed the missiles he just beamed aboard to explode – and Khan has no idea his unconscious crew were removed first, remember. He thinks his people are dead. His suicide run at Starfleet HQ is the last revenge of a man who’s lost everything…

Ah, I hear you cry. But Khan is a war criminal, a genetic Nazi who wiped out those who didn’t live up to his idea of perfection…

But is that even true? Admiral Marcus says Khan’s a convicted criminal, but we’re way past believing him. Alternate Spock from a parallel universe says that the Khan he knew did terrible things. Does that necessarily mean this Khan did?

And it’s worth remembering that if the writers wanted us to be sure of Khan’s evil past, Kirk or any of his crew could have obtained evidence from another source, one less equivocal than a traitorous general or an alternate timestream. But they didn’t.

So taking all this into account, isn’t there an argument to be made that Khan is equally moral – perhaps even more moral – than Kirk?

Am I being disingenuous? Perhaps. But my point is, the labels we apply to our characters are powerful tools. “Hero” and “Villain” have a way of twisting the audience’s perception of what a character does and how justified they are in doing it. So when we use these labels, let’s use them wisely…

8 comments on “Who Are You Calling A Bad Guy?

  1. Ah, League of Super-Evil is a kids’ cartoon with adult appeal that deals with the issue here in a pretty pure form. The content is very much built on playing with tropes, but particularly the issue of hero/villian/naff naif.

    Star trek seems to be playing with us, and/or making a sensible point, in a different way; is there a political angle there? Khan is a Muslim name.

    • debbiemoon says:

      True, but Khan’s name goes all the way back to the original series (I think?), so I guess we shouldn’t read too much into that. Undoubtedly the plot takes in contemporary politics and terrorism, though, so the name is an apt coincidence…

    • Celine Sparrow says:

      Yeah like a lot of people make a connection In harry potter between the whole mudblood/pure blood conflict, and racism in real life

  2. while reading the “plot problems” about spock prime showing up again on the bridge screen -in public… i just thought of a better evil scheme for adm marcus…lol spock prime.. not khan should be the “biggest baddest” threat to control– in the new jj verse…. hes from the frakkiin future… — co created the beaming stuff.. which of course makes the vengeance a silly old toy for dispnesing torpedoes… no that the “future guy” who is older spock..is out of the bag…. wouldnt evil starfleet area 31 be all over him?,, locked up in a tantalus room 24/7 with his mind being sucked dry via tech/paid off vulcan area 31 duded left over from pa gem..lol khan.who cares… spock prime… now hes the one who who should be in need of rescue…. or did i just stumble upon jjtrek111 the search for spock prime?:) anyhow… maybe one day someome brought up on star wars will make something original.

    • debbiemoon says:

      Well, that’s an interesting thought. I suppose we’re meant to assume that Starfleet in general (excluding Marcus) is sufficiently morally advanced that they refuse to exploit Spock Prime. Which is presumably also the reason Khan and crew end up back in cold storage rather than being ‘milked’ for their cure-all blood, which is what any less morally advanced civilisation would have done…

  3. There is so much material here for them to show the underside of star trek. The entire tv series begins with the nero events and marcus reviving khan.

  4. Regardless of the Star Trek history of Khan in the original or alternate universe, his villain status is quite apparent. Going solely on his behaviour towards others and even his own words we do rightfully judge him as a bad guy.
    Luckily we’re justified by our gut feelings as we do eventually find out his ultimate game plan to dominate the universe by the end of the film but the clues to his moral standing were there all along.
    Throughout the story he uses everyone to get to where he needs to go.

    Firstly he manipulates Marcus into making the ultimate warship. Smuggled his crew into the torpedoes that will go into this vessel. After his plan is discovered, he runs, finds a desperate father with access to the Starfleet base to trick him into saving his daughter that will lead to an event that will slaughter hundreds of other people. Khan then escapes to Klingon space waiting for Marcus to chase him with the warship which will start a galactic war. However, Marcus sends the Enterprise and Khan fights them until he learns they have his crew. He allows himself to be captured, which will draw Marcus to him. Now after building trust with Kirk, he uses him to eventually take over the warship.

    So what does this say about Khan. Apart from his complete disregard for life other than his own and his crew’s, he shows determination to succeed by any means necessary. He’s self quoted as being “Better then everything” now that’s either arrogance or a superiority complex. Not the sort of thing a modest or compassionate person would say. He manipulates everyone through either their generous trusting natures or their fears.

    Now we could see Khan as an underlining metaphor for how JJ Abrams sees America, Hollywood or any cooperate body that operates in the same way, but that’s another topic altogether. 😉

  5. Celine Sparrow says:

    It is kinda like in Sweeney Todd, Benjamin Barker is the main and the villain is the judge, but Benjamin Barker turns out to be a serial killer….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s